I still truly believe in how Heritage handles housing as a unique take that removes a lot of issues around auto account creation, VPNs, houses for storage, and the laborious task of even trying to enforce that would only take away from time spent actually coding new events and fixing current content.
I also believe in the idea of houses, all houses eventually, having worth and being a limited commodity. Being a real estate broker can be a fun and rewarding profession on UO.
I also understand the frustration when a player sees another player/guild owning a majority of what they believe to be the "best locations".
The Idea:
The objective - If you want to be the Rockafella of Heritage, and own all the property, you have to maintain said property more than the casual house trader/owner.
This is only an idea and no coding has even been started on this. I am just looking for opinions at this time, on this potential compromise. We are still a long way off from housing being an issue but in about two years houses in the world went from 300 to closing in on 900 now. (400 of those in the last year alone)
I also believe in the idea of houses, all houses eventually, having worth and being a limited commodity. Being a real estate broker can be a fun and rewarding profession on UO.
I also understand the frustration when a player sees another player/guild owning a majority of what they believe to be the "best locations".
The Idea:
- We won't be capping the number of houses a player can own, on any one account.
- Houses are given a "Priority" property that can be accessed on the house sign for the owner only.
- 5 houses can be marked "Priority I"
- Normal 6 month decay cycle
- 10 houses can be marked "Priority II"
- 3 month decay cycle
- The rest automatically become marked "Priority III"
- 1 month decay cycle
- 5 houses can be marked "Priority I"
The objective - If you want to be the Rockafella of Heritage, and own all the property, you have to maintain said property more than the casual house trader/owner.
This is only an idea and no coding has even been started on this. I am just looking for opinions at this time, on this potential compromise. We are still a long way off from housing being an issue but in about two years houses in the world went from 300 to closing in on 900 now. (400 of those in the last year alone)
Upvote
0